Application Cell Index

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

2 of the 25 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 23 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 3 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source for each breakdown it prices, in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences for one breakdown), so a page that gives figures for several breakdowns gives one for each and N counts 3 figures, never sentences; 18 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): one row per PACKAGED CELL per application, with what the package contains (arm, power source, torch or gripper, table or cart, fence or scanner, software, training) and the vendor's own starting price where it states one.

The derivation is the CELL MULTIPLE: the packaged price divided by the same arm's price from the model index, per application - the number that answers 'the arm is $37k, why is the quote $105k' and that neither the arm maker nor the cell vendor publishes, because each sells only its own half.

Beside it the count of cell vendors publishing a starting price at all (Hirebotics and Vectis do; Fronius, CLOOS, Robotiq, Columbia/Okura, Acieta and Productive Robotics quote), the rental and payment-deferral terms several now lead with instead of a price, and changed-since on each read.

18 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.